SIENNA MILLER WINS AGAINST PAPARAZZI

Hollywood star Sienna Miller is celebrating after winning a default judgment against a photographer who took nude shots of the star during filming for her movie, "Hippie Hippie Shake." Miller claimed the naked pictures shot by paparazzi photographer Warren Richardson last year had been taken without consent, and at a hearing at London's High Court on Thursday, Mr. Justice Eady granted a permanent injunction against the celebrity snapper. Richardson had taken the "highly intrusive" photos on the closed set of "Hippie Hippie Shake" in Surrey, England, as Miller was disrobing to film a scene in a lake. The images were then sold by his employer, Xposure Photo Agency, to British tabloids The Sun and the News of the World, which published them in October. The actress was awarded $75,000 in damages in an invasion of privacy lawsuit filed against the photo agency and the publications' parent company, News Group Newspapers, in December, after a judge ruled in her favor. In addition, they agreed not to reprint the photos and delete all existing copies. Richardson has also promised not to use the still images in the future, and any damages will be decided at a later date. He has also been ordered to pay costs.Miller was represented in court by her lawyer David Sherborne, as she is currently away filming abroad.

Comments

Anonymous said…
What utter crap! Sienna Miller deliberately went topless on the beach when she knew paparazzi were following her. She is a skank. She's done tons of extremely graphic nude scenes. The DVD uncut version of "Factory Girl" has a sex scene that belongs in a porn movie. The photos of Sienna topless and being an exhibitionist were published around September 2007 when she was hanging out with John Rhys. BTW, her boobs are really tiny, like 2 little walnut sized breasts. She is so flat chested, she looks like she's flat as a board - so if some paps took her pix with no clothes on, nobody is interested in looking at her walnut sized boobs.
Anonymous said…
Pretty lame comment there. Yeah she may seem like a tramp. (She kind of is.) But there's no need to go into talking about her breasts. Which I think are beautiful. Don't be jealous over women either you can't have or are better looking than you.
Anonymous said…
I think it's quite clear that people are interested in seeing her nude or dressed, and her "walnut sized breasts" don't seem to matter. Maybe you're jealous, or maybe you really feel she is ugly. Either way, one thing is quite clear, you're wrong. I strongly believe that a court judge is most likely smarter than you, and would not of ruled in favor of Sienna if she had no just cause for the suit.